Review


Week 3

Agenda

  1. Review / take-up Week 2 problem
  2. Feudal land tenure

The Problem

The hunter has a a Nova Scotia Mi’kmaq Harvester Identification Card issued by the Assembly of Nova Scotia Mi’kmaw Chiefs but no hunting licence. The dog owner happens to be carrying a licence and claims exclusive property in the fox. Is the dog owner correct? Why or why not?

Answer Framework

  • What part of this framework did you understand best?

  • What part did you understand least?

</div>

Locke (1690), Henderson on Treaty (1752)

Compare Locke’s theory of property relations with Henderson’s interpretation of treaty relations. Which seem more plausible or relevant to the context of land relations in the Atlantic region in the mid-18th century?

17th and 18th Century Context: Imperialism
British Settlement at Halifax, 1749
British Settlement at Halifax, 1750

Feudal Land Tenure

  • Background to the common law doctrine of Aboriginal Title in context of settler colonialism

  • Locke: property in a “state of nature”

  • Feudal tenure is the “public law” framework for property in land originating in medieval England

Roots of British Land Tenure

  • Early medieval / Anglo-Saxon England (5th to 11th centuries)

  • Norman conquest / Battle of Hastings (1066)

</div>

Key Features of Feudal Tenure

  1. All land “owned” by the king (radical or allodial title)

  2. Privilege of tenure: property held “of the king”

  3. Feudal incidents (personal relations, fealty, obligations)

  4. Subinfeudation (tenants-in-chief, land lords, Quia Emptores 1290)

  5. Restraints on descent alienation

Common Law Estates

Ownership of a legal interest in land, not ownership of land (e.g. fee simple estate).

Next week: Doctrine of Aboriginal Title

How does the common law doctrine of Aboriginal Title “fit” into the structure of feudal land tenure we discussed today? On what assumptions does it depend?